I asked this question in order to get an idea of how often my
music magazine would go out, I’ve decided weekly, and that will correspond with
a lowish cost, making it more likely it will be bought every week.
Five out of ten people who filled in my questionnaire read
music magazines monthly, compared to four people who read them weekly; it’s
only a difference of one, so I believe I’m safe to have a weekly published
magazine. If I asked more people to fill in the questionnaire, then I think
there’d be a bigger gap between the two, with more who don’t read music
magazines.
Continuing on the people who don’t read music magazines, the
people I asked to fill in my questionnaires are people I know to read them,
with one I knew didn’t. I chose this range so I could get a mixture or
responses. Though I wanted more who didn’t read them to fill it in. The intended audience is young to older teens/young adults.
I chose this question to ask, as it would give me an idea of
cost to regularity ratio. From this chart, it looks like the people who get the
magazine monthly are either paying less than the weekly people, or the monthly
people are paying more with one paying less.
I think the latter is more plausible, as paying £5 a month
for a magazine is more attractive then paying £5 a week.
Again, the one person who doesn’t read music magazines
doesn’t pay anything, obvious as they don’t read them, but that one could be
explained as someone who doesn’t buy the magazines themselves, simply reads a
siblings or waiting room or whatever copy of the magazine, rather then buy it
themselves. This makes this question data not very reliable, and so would
require tweaking if I did the audience research again.
Not surprisingly, a big 60% wanted to pay a low amount for a
music magazine. Where that is obvious why (nice and cheap), the quality of such
a low priced magazine would be in question. Such a price would be more
characteristic of a weekly mini mag anyway, whereas the more expensive would be
the chunky monthly issues.
No one wanted to pay over £3 for a music magazine, which is
interesting as £3+ is the average price of most music magazines I’ve seen.
These results boil down to two simple answers. A weekly, cheap, low standard
music magazine. Or an average priced, monthly or weekly, high quality magazine.
The majority of the vote went to Q&As/interviews, then posters/free gifts. Not many were interested in a new act feature (just 20%), with big images getting 30% and one person suggesting celeb facts
Q&A’s are what makes a magazine a magazine. Without them,
there would just be a few features, images, and that would be about it. They
are popular with the music audience as they wish to read about the star as
they’re fond of them and wish to know more about their lives and personality,
or even band dynamics and tips for beginners.
Everyone loves a free gift, and posters are expensive from
shops, meaning it’s great to have them for practically free.
Old favourites are more popular then new upcoming acts.
However, It’s important these starting out artists get exposure, or else no-one
would have a clue who they are and where to find them., and nice big images of
them can often introduce them more easily then any Q&A.
The
majority went for a keyring of a musical instrument, which is an obvious choice
for a music magazine. Two went for an animal, and two again went for a person.
It
would be interesting to combine the two, having an animal/person holding an
instrument. The keyring being for a charity for young children, animals would
be a nice choice. I’ll expand this idea, and do a design page and put it on the
blog.
A
big 80% went for relevant ads, being shown where to get a certain brand of
fashion or being informed about the latest festivals are key to the reader’s
experience of the magazine. Seven went for informal language, with six going
for Q&As. Informal language can make the magazine feel more relaxed and
laid back, inviting and open for the reader to dive right in.
Five
went for posters and high quality images, three for competitions and two for
new acts. This suggests they want to be actively engaged in the magazine, as
competitions require interaction from the reader, and posters need to be taken
out from the fiddly staples. High quality images are expected of a magazine,
along with information about new acts.
No comments:
Post a Comment